JEFF SIMON

for Anoka Hennepin School Board

Home
About Jeff
Campaign Activities
How You Can Help
Contact Jeff
Site Map
Campaign Activities (check back for regular updates)
 
Oct. 1st- 11th

Door Knocking Interrupted

Unfortunately, I’m not going to be able to get out door knocking this weekend or into the beginning of next week as we are fairly confident that one of my sons (and maybe the other) has the flu.  As our whole family received the seasonal flu mist a few weeks ago, if this is the flu it probably is H1N1.  Although I really want to get out and continue hearing from all of you, I don’t want to be the one to spread this flu even more than it is now.  I intend to be back out during the last few weeks of the campaign.

 

North Metro TV Forum

I participated in another candidate forum, this time at North Metro TV station.  It will be distributed to the local cable stations in our area.  If you are able to watch and have any comments, please let me know your thoughts.  There were two very distinct styles of presentation from the candidates.  We received all of the questions a week before the taping, and I spent a lot of time preparing as you will be able to see when viewing.  Another style from one candidate, was answering the questions in more of a “off the cuff” way.  I don’t know what viewers will prefer, but as I’m new at this I felt that it was important to prepare so that I could effectively communicate my positions.  Hopefully you will take away that the time I spent preparing for this forum is an example of how I will approach my service on the School Board if elected.  If you are not able to watch the forum, I’ve included the questions and my answers below.  I would really like to hear your feedback, so please send an e-mail if you have a chance.  

 

North Metro TV Forum Questions:

 

#1 - Anoka-Hennepin, just like many other districts, is dealing with a budget crisis.  What do you believe needs to be done to solve the yearly budget shortfall seen in the district?

In the short term, the current board has addressed some of the most serious issues facing our district, that have a direct impact on the budget shortfalls by making the decision to close schools next year. It was a difficult decision and continues to be a difficult time for our students and families.  We need to ensure that their voices are heard during the transition to new schools. 

 

Enrollment is anticipated to decline far into the future, and obviously, educational funding is based on the number of students enrolled. Although expenses do decrease with fewer students, expenditures do not decrease at the same rate as many are fixed costs. With this reality, the district needs to continue long-term planning for the future and not lose sight that we need to reach out to our community and listen to their feedback. 

 

We also need to be an advocate for our schools, the community, and the things important to our residents—including the best education we can provide to our students, so that we can continue to invite families to move to our district and minimize the trend of declining enrollment.

 

Another issue which continues to follow the Anoka-Hennepin School District year after year is lower per-student State funding than other districts, even in the Twin Cities surrounding area.

 

We need to review the past attempts to make our position heard, evaluate the current strategy, and immediately put into place a long-term, comprehensive plan to have the State address this situation.  This is a matter of fairness for our students, and it needs to be one of our main priorities.

 

Beyond this, we can minimize budget issues by continuing to be fiscally prudent.  This is the expectation of every tax payer, and we must build upon the successes our district has achieved in this area.

 

#2 - What will you do to have open lines of communication between yourself and parents, students, and staff?

As I have mentioned many times tonight, Community Outreach is one of my guiding principles.  This outreach includes parents, students, staff, but also all residents, even those that do not have student aged children.

 

My plan to accomplish this will include:

Creating an Advisory Group with the hope that all who participate will engage family, friends, neighbors and co-workers who also live in our district.

 

And I will also establish School Board conferences modeled after Parent/Teacher conferences so that residents in my district will have direct access.

 

Outreach for me also means being visible in our schools, and listening closely to our administrators, teachers, and school staff.  We know, and heard from the community many times during the recent Open Hearings, that we are blessed with outstanding teachers and school staff. 

These experts have so much experience and knowledge for the board to tap and it’s up to us, not them, to seek out their help.

 

Just as important, I believe we need to learn from where we have been and make changes for improvement.  A specific example is a review of the process used to make the school closing decisions. 

 

Although there were many good aspects, this process could have been improved to allow for additional public feedback. Building into the process an opportunity for community comments multiple times throughout the process, and early enough for ideas to be thoroughly evaluated, is very important. 

 

One of the great things about running for a local position is that it is “local,” and all of us have a greater opportunity to hear, and actually listen to, many of the residents in our community. 

 


#3 - Outside of budget concerns what do you believe is the most important issue facing the district today?

Currently, the most important issue for our district is the transition that our students, families, and staff are facing with the recently announced school closings.  Healing our community and successfully going forward will be greatly influenced by the community outreach process that is put in place for this transition. 

 

I am hearing from the community that parents did not feel that they were adequately represented or given the opportunity to present feedback with enough time for the Board to properly investigate those ideas.

 

Let’s learn from that process and put into place a comprehensive program with multiple opportunities for community feedback, as well as detailed explanations of all the options available.  The decision has been made; now let’s give the community more influence in how the transition will proceed, and information so that they feel comfortable in knowing the board is truly listening.

 

Many of them have already lost their children’s schools; it’s paramount that we give them an opportunity to be involved. Schools, for many, are like family, and simply “assigning” them new families is not something to be taken lightly.

 

The greatest concern long term, is that declining enrollment (reduction of 300 – 500 students per year) appears to be the norm far into the future. 

 

We need to make sure that the long-term planning is in place now for these significant changes, make sure that there is flexibility build into this planning, and again, involve the community as much as possible as our district goes forward. 

 

#4 - How can our schools incorporate technology into more aspects of the classroom experience?

Our students, like many of us, live in the digital world, and I believe that we must strive to engage them within the classroom through the same media in which they live. In their personal lives, students today play video games, while listening to an iPod, while texting their friends, all while watching a TV show.

 

Although this level of multitasking is not recommended, it shows that students are not only comfortable with technology, they demand it, and studies are pointing to the fact that success can be greatly benefited by using these tools in the classroom to enhance learning and engage differentiated learners, not to replace teaching.  

 

A recent article in NEA Today titled, “Turning the Page: Students live in a digital world; are schools ready to join them?” focused on this subject.  It was stated that technology benefited students by facilitating the ability to learn from and collaborate with others, by making the learning more self-directed and self-motivated, and, one of the greatest strengths, the ability to move beyond the classroom.

I brought a quote which speaks to this:  “Real time learning, in which students can remotely control microscopes at laboratories thousands of miles away or speak to experts in almost any field, for example, means that students are more engaged to learn.” 

 

Beyond classroom tools such as computers and Smart Boards, we need to encourage all teachers to embed technology into their entire curriculum.  Some examples include, student-created portfolios, technology-infused electives, blogging, virtual field trips

The NEA article also discussed the potential for teachers to resist as they may not be comfortable with technology.  I do know that many teachers have already embraced this effort, but for others the district must make sure that adequate training is in place so that they feel comfortable incorporating technology.   

 

#5 - What can you bring to this position that no one else can?

I believe that my combination of experience in both the private sector and in the educational system in our schools provides a unique perspective for service on our School Board.

 

My business background includes extensive budgeting, planning, and negotiations work, and these are very important skills for a board member whose decisions affect taxpayer dollars, especially in the current economic climate.

 

My time spent in education as a guidance counselor allows me to truly understand the joys and challenges that our students, teachers and school staff face.

 

Also, my current life stage is unique among the candidates, having young children in our schools – one son just began Kindergarten this year and my youngest is attending Early Childhood Family Education.  I have a very personal vested interest in our district’s success.

 

I also think that it’s important that my background more closely matches with the backgrounds of the majority of our community members.  I will bring a relevant perspective which is needed on our School Board.

 

Finally, in my opinion, it’s very important for a candidate to not only have a set of guiding principles for their service, but also openly communicate those to the community and voters. 

In every decision, I will consider my Guiding Principles of Transparency, Accountability and Community Outreach.

 

I possess a strong desire and motivation to expand information for our residents, truly understand your views, and will always consider this feedback while serving.

 

 

Sept.21st- 30th

School Board Meeting on Monday the 28th

I attended this meeting, as did many community members (and press).  Of course, the school closing issue was voted on and approved.  It was very difficult and emotional for many.  This has been, and will continue to be a difficult time for our district.

 

Now that the decision has been made, it is very important that the transition process involves you—the community—at an increased level of involvement than we’ve had previously.  Please refer to my comments below under the title “Sept. 14th - 20th Potential School Closing."  Multiple opportunities for community feedback, with enough time to actually act upon that feedback, is imperative.  Let's learn from the process that was just used, listen to our community, and go forward together.

  

League of Women Voters Forum

I participated in the League of Women Voters Forum which was broadcast live and taped for future airing on our local cable channels.  The League, and all of the candidates, were very welcoming and helpful.  I would like to thank them once again.

 

As you know, this is my first time as a candidate, and definitely my first time participating in this type of forum.  I'm used to presenting to groups through my work experience, but this was certainly outside of my comfort zone.  I am relatively satisfied that I was able to communicate my guiding principles, but I also know that my nerves were noticeable on more than a few questions.  Please overlook all of the "ums;" my wife is an English teacher and already told me to try to minimize this distraction.  Hopefully I will improve and be able to represent both my and your views more clearly in the future.

 

Clarification on the question about Government Mandates:

This is the question that I believe was the main one for which I did not communicate my thoughts clearly.  Here's another try:  The one government mandate that I most often hear questions and comments about is the federal No Child Left Behind Act, and related to this, AYP or Annual Yearly Progress. 

 

No Child Left Behind is standards-based education, which establishes measurable goals.  There is no "National Achievement Standard," which is another misconception I have heard.  States are tasked with developing their own standards. AYP is a score or rating that each school in MN receives based on a number of standards.  Tests are the most commonly known measure. 

 

Many have asked why some of the schools in our district have not made AYP in 2009, even after making it in 2008.  I've researched this question and have found that beyond testing, the State has made graduation and attendance rates part of the AYP standard.  In addition, each year the percentage of students that must pass increases to "make" AYP.  For example, in '08 a school may have been required to have 75% of their students pass testing, but in 2009 they may need 80%.  Both of these standards are good in my opinion, but if a school made AYP last year, and did not this year, it may not be that the school is performing more poorly.

 

Regardless of these changes,  AYP is a standard that the State, our parents, and residents use to evaluate progress.  It is important. To continue improving in this area, we must continually evaluate and ask our experts, teachers and school staff, how we can improve and meet the State requirements.  Our teachers and school staff are very qualified and great resources.  We must reach out to them more often and utilize their knowledge and experience.

 

If you would like any additional answers or you have any feedback, please let me know.

 

Door Knocking

I’ve been out door knocking and receiving as much feedback from all of you as possible.  Thanks to everyone for being so friendly and willing to offer your thoughts.  I will be out each weekend, and as much as I can in the evenings during the week.

  

Sept. 14th - 20th 
Potential School Closing
I attended the public hearings on potential school closings at both Coon Rapids High School & Champlin Park High School.  
 
There was a huge outpouring of support from parents of schools on the potential closing list, especially the schools named in Scenario 1 & 2.  It is clear that parents of this district value their children's schools, teachers, and administrators. 
 
It was also clear that many parents came away from the hearings with the belief that their research, preparation, and public comments would not result in any changes.  I listened to the community members' comments and then observed them as they walked away from the microphone.  They appeared to be excited preparing for and delivery their comments, but then defeated as they walked away with a perception that their comments would not make a difference.  
 
A recent Facebook exchange between two Riverview parents echoed this perception:
 
"I have a sad feeling after having been at the meeting tonight that the decision was,
and always had been, predetermined."
-Nicole                                              
 
"I didn't go to the [meeting] on Wed, but did attend Thursday's meeting in Champlin.  My heart swelled to hear all the parents supporting Riverview.  But Nicole, I fear you're right.  I always thought the decision was already made, since they are voting only 11 days after the public hearings.  There is no time to examine other options."
-Jen                                                    
 
I believe the process used to create these scenarios could have been improved to allow for  additional public feedbackBuilding into the process an opportunity for community comments multiple times throughout the process, and early enough for ideas to be researched is important on many levels.  Ultimately, the final decisions may have been the same, but at least the community would be a bigger part of the process.
  
Levy
I volunteered for my son's school PTO levy group and attended an informational meeting to discuss details of the levy and the potential cuts needed if the levy does not pass.  This group and meeting were formed to get out the "yes" vote.  My intent was to gain a better understanding of this levy and be able to communicate to residents, and answer their questions as I campaign.  In my opinion, it is important for each voter to be informed on both sides of the issues.
 
Here is what I found
This levy is a renewal of a 10 year levy passed in 1999 that expires.  Currently, district residents are paying approximately $56 per year if they own a $200,000 home.  It is estimated that a $200,000 home property taxes will go up just over $2 per month, or $24 per year if the levy passes. 
 
As a fiscal conservative, I believe increasing taxes is an issue everyone should take very seriously.  We should also not minimize the potential impact of the cuts our schools will receive if the levy does not pass. 
 
Residents have already commented to me that with past levies, proposed cuts seemed to be inflated to "scare" residents in voting yes.  And when these levies failed, the cuts never actually occurred.  In my research, I have not been able to find any specific examples of this happening, but in the past I have shared the feeling that district's communications emphasized the worst case scenario without options.
 
I do not know what other areas were researched by the board and the district to make the $8M+ cuts if the levy does not pass, but I think that the process used, and all of the options considered should be shared with all.  This transparency will help alleviate the perception mentioned above, and if there was an exhaustive review to come to these proposed cuts, (which should be the expectation), this transparency could actually help the district pass the levy.
 
I have come to the conclusion that the current school board would more than likely make some or all of the proposed cuts listed if the levy does not pass.  Of course, it will be up to the voters to research this issue for themselves and come to their own conclusions.  In my opinon, allowing voters to directly voice their wishes, is a positive for the levy process.   Proposed cuts are listed on the District website if you are interested.